Is Wood Decking Better Than Composite?

Choosing the right material for a deck can be a challenging decision. Two of the most popular choices are wood and composite decking. Both have their advantages and disadvantages, which we will explore in this article. We’ll look at the durability, cost, maintenance, and aesthetics of each option, and provide real-world examples and expert opinions to help you make an informed decision.

Durability: Wood vs. Composite

When it comes to durability, wood decks can hold up well over time if properly maintained. However, they are susceptible to weathering, rotting, and insect damage. On the other hand, composite decking is made from a mixture of recycled plastic and wood fibers, making it more resistant to moisture, fading, and staining. According to the National Association of Home Builders, composite decking lasts longer and requires less maintenance than wood decks (Source).

Cost: Wood vs. Composite

The initial cost of wood decking is generally lower than composite decking. However, when considering long-term costs, composite decking may be a better investment due to its lower maintenance requirements. The cost of wood decking can increase significantly over time due to the need for regular sealing, staining, and replacement of damaged boards. A study by HomeAdvisor found that the average cost of installing a composite deck is $30-$40 per square foot, compared to $15-$30 per square foot for wood (Source).

Maintenance: Wood vs. Composite

Maintenance is a crucial factor to consider when choosing between wood and composite decking. Wood decks require frequent sealing or staining to protect against weathering and decay. In contrast, composite decks require minimal maintenance, typically just an occasional cleaning with soap and water. However, composite decking can become scratched or faded over time, requiring replacement of individual boards. According to This Old House, composite decking is easier to maintain but may not be as customizable as wood (Source).

Aesthetics: Wood vs. Composite

Wood decks offer a natural, organic look that many homeowners find appealing. They can be stained or painted in a variety of colors, allowing for customization to match the home’s exterior. Composite decking, while available in various colors and textures, often has a more uniform appearance. Some people prefer the traditional look of wood, while others appreciate the modern aesthetic of composite materials. According to HGTV, both options can enhance the beauty of a backyard space (Source).

Conclusion

Both wood and composite decking have their pros and cons. When deciding which material is best for your project, consider factors such as durability, cost, maintenance, and aesthetics. While wood decks may be less expensive upfront, composite decks often prove to be a better long-term investment due to their low maintenance requirements. Ultimately, the choice depends on your personal preferences and budget.

Reference

National Association of Home Builders
HomeAdvisor
This Old House
HGTV